Please spread the word and encourage those in favour to come out and support the march.
Secondly we are asking people to join a campaign requesting An Taise to withdraw their objection, anyone interested can email; email@example.com Ref John Hartnett, Charles Stanley Smith, asking that An Taisce withdraws its request for a judicial review – for the sake of those who live and work on the peninsula and have guarded its heritage and respected its environment from the dawn of civilization
An Taisce challenges contentious upgrade of the scenic N86 Dingle Route
14th January 2015
On January 13th 2015, An Taisce was granted leave to Judicially Review An Bord Pleanála’s November 2014 decision, to grant permission for the N86 Dingle to Annascaul & Gortbreagoge to Camp Road Improvement Scheme (Note 1).
The route is renowned for its scenic quality, natural and built heritage; including prehistoric features. In summary: the scheme proposes to widen the road and add cycle lanes resulting in a wide range of environmental impacts, including visual landscape impacts.
An Taisce’s challenge to this decision of the Board to grant permission is based on the Board’s failure to fulfil obligations under the EU Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (Note 2). The case is due to return to the court in March.
This is the second time that this scheme has been judicially reviewed. Kerry County Council challenged an earlier decision by An Bord Pleanála in Sep 2013 to refuse the same scheme. That challenge resulted in the Board’s decision being quashed and remitted to the Board in April 2014. On revisiting the same scheme again, this time the Board granted permission and this latest decision is now under challenge by An Taisce.
John Harnett, Chair of An Taisce commenting on the challenge said:
“The impact of this development proposal on this most scenic route into the world-renowned Dingle peninsula, so rich in its natural and built heritage is of concern to An Taisce. In particular, the manner in which the assessment of this scheme has been compromised by carving an original schemed of 32 km up into chunks and the failure then to rectify omissions in the assessment of the whole 32 km scheme, is key among our reasons for bringing this challenge.”
“An Taisce is concerned with the precedent here in subverting the objectives and obligations of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, which requires the assessment of projects as a whole to be assessed by the Competent Authority, in this case – An Bord Pleanála.
The EIA directive is such an important instrument to us all for ensuring the environmental impacts of development are assessed properly in order to inform the whole consent procedure, and to address necessary environmental mitigation and protections as necessary.
An Taisce is seeking to uphold the law in order to protect our shared heritage”